|
Gyle
|
Date
|
Original
|
I B U
|
A B V
|
|
60 |
8
/ 10 / 1884 |
1.050 |
38 |
6.7
% |
|
42 |
3
/ 12 / 1884 |
1.050.25 |
48 |
5.9 % |
|
58 |
21
/ 12 / 1885 |
1.049 |
46 |
5.7 % |
|
19 |
29
/ 10 / 1886 |
1.050.5 |
46 |
5.9 % |
|
85 |
31
/ 1 / 1887 |
1.050 |
46 |
5.8 % |
|
143 |
27
/ 4 / 1887 |
1.050 |
42 |
5.8 % |
|
157 |
27
/ 5 / 1889 |
1.050
* |
44 |
5.8 % |
|
|
|
1.059.75 |
46 |
7.2 % |
|
|
|
1.046.25 |
44 |
5.3 % |
|
55 |
27
/ 12 / 1889 |
1.050 |
46 |
5.8
% |
|
99 |
17
/ 3 / 1890 |
1.050 |
42 |
5.8 % |
|
190 |
4
/ 7 / 1890 |
1.050 |
42 |
5.8 % |
|
188 |
12
/ 8 / 1890 |
1.051
* |
42 |
6.0 % |
|
|
|
1.052.75 |
42 |
6.25
% |
|
|
|
1.050 |
42 |
5.8
% |
|
73 |
29
/ 1 / 1891 |
1.052.75 |
42 |
5.8 % |
|
BOTTLING
FAMILY ALE 1885 - 1891
|
||||
|
72 |
15
/ 1 / 1885 |
1.051 |
78 |
5.8
% |
|
205 |
24
/ 2 / 1886 |
1.052.25 |
76 |
6.0
% |
|
87 |
2
/ 2 / 1887 |
1.050.5
* |
76 |
5.8
% |
|
|
|
1.051 |
76 |
5.9 % |
|
|
|
1.050 |
76 |
5.7 % |
|
56 |
31
/ 12 / 1889 |
1.060.5 |
80 |
6.6 % |
|
22 |
7
/ 11 / 1890 |
1.052.75 |
80 |
6.1 % |
|
72 |
28
/ 1 / 1891 |
1.052.75 |
82 |
6.1 % |
|
PALE
FAMILY ALE 1887 - 1891
|
||||
|
94 |
11
/ 2 / 1887 |
1.049 |
42 |
5.6 % |
|
61 |
12
/ 1 / 1891 |
1.052.75 |
44 |
6.4 % |
|
82 |
12
/ 2 / 1891 |
1.050 |
42 |
5.7 % |
|
86 |
18
/ 2 / 1891 |
1.050 |
42 |
5.8 % |
Tuesday, 4 August 2026
W B MEW , LANGTON & Co : FAMILY ALES 1884 - 1889
How Do All ,
Some time ago , I began to re examine the W B Mew, Langton & Co brewing records ;
Photos of which were kindly sent by Jeff Secchiari of The Brewery History Society ,
Cheers Jeff 🍻.
To excise a drawn out fable , I began to be unhappy with my analysis .
In particular the gross disparity in I B U bandwith in the Osbourne Pale Ales and ,
The Grist Proportions of the Porters and Stouts * .
In consequence of this rather irritating conclusion , I started my analysis afresh ;
Reasoning that a successfull commercial brewery capable of producing up to 200 Barrels
Of a beer such as Osbourne Pale Ale would , In the interest of product consistency and ,
Repeat sales have ensured a reasonable degree of homogenisation in re `Perceived Bitterness `,
And , Hop Charge Points ( Relative to Gravity @ Charge and , Wort Length IN COPPER )
across All ( sic ) brewings of O P A as recorded in the surviving brewing books from Mew`s
Newport brewery **.
The table below shows the reformed analysis of the O P A brews selected for investigation ;
With the * in table referring to the AVERAGE Original Gravity ;
As a number of the brewings contain eg 138.5 Barrels in FV 1 @ 23.6 Lbs / Brl and
up to 3 - 4 Other Wort Lengths IN F V 1 ; Eg : FV 2 : 48.5 Wort Barrels @ 20.8 Lbs ,
FV 3 : 42 Wort Barrels @ 23.6 Lbs , + X Barrels of other Worts = Average Original Gravity / * .
Today`s outpouring of beery knowledge continues my analysis of the beers of
W B Mew, Langton & Co ; In the shape of their Family Ales ;
I hope you all enjoy the information .
The 3 Surviving Brewing Books from the Newport Brewery of W B Mew , Langton & Co
Are cared for by the team at The Isle of Wight Records Office , Cat Ref : ML 44
* This relates to the Extract Poundage of 1 Quarter of Black Malt @ an Av of 50 Lbs / Qtr
** I believe the Mew family operated another brewery on the Isle of Wight ,
Any technical details or , even brewing records would be welcomed ,
Please get in touch or comment below if you`re able to assist .
This Table , Analysis Etc C Edd Mather 2026
Cheers All 🍻,
Edd
AS WITH ALL OTHER BLOGPOSTS ;
NO PART OF THIS BLOG OR IT`S CONTENT
MAY BE USED TO TRAIN ARTIFICIAL INTELEGENCE MODELS OR ,
DEVELOP AND TRAIN A I SOFTWARE / COMPUTER SOFTWARE & PROGRAMMES
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment